Network TodayNetwork Today
    What's Hot

    8 people electrocuted as heavy rainfall and flooding sweep South African settlements

    September 27, 2023

    Trump, Weighing In on Auto Strike, Has a Mixed Legacy on Unions

    September 27, 2023

    UK regulators approve plans for vast new North Sea oilfield

    September 27, 2023
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms
    • Contact
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Wednesday, September 27
    Network TodayNetwork Today
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Energy
    • Technology
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Sports
    Network TodayNetwork Today
    Home » Their DNA Hides a Warning, but They Don’t Want to Know What It Says

    Their DNA Hides a Warning, but They Don’t Want to Know What It Says

    January 21, 20223 Mins Read Health
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    What should happen when researchers, while sequencing a participant’s DNA as part of a large study, discover gene variants that increase the risk for conditions that might be prevented with medical treatment or surveillance? Some researchers believe they have an obligation to find the participants — often years after they provided a DNA sample — contact them, and tell them what they have found. But, some research subjects, like Ms. Konstadt, feel they have a right not to know. Is it ethical for doctors to let them insist they can opt out of learning more without first knowing the particular risk they are facing?

    For Dr. Robert Green, an investigator for the biobank with Ms. Konstadt’s DNA, the Mass General Brigham Biobank, and author of a recent paper about its policies, the answers are clear. The consent form for the biobank tells participants that if the researchers find a worrisome variant, and if there is an intervention that can reduce risk, the participants will be contacted. There will be seven attempts to reach participants — calls and letters — before the team gives up.

    “We are offering the information, not forcing participants to accept it,” said Dr. Green, who is also a geneticist and professor of medicine at Harvard. “If you don’t answer the phone or decide when offered that you don’t want to hear anything more, or even hang up on us when we call, then that’s your choice.”

    Two days after Ms. Konstadt made that choice when she replied to the first caller, she got another call. Was she sure she didn’t want to know? Once again, she declined, and did the same after a third call.

    Dr. Green and his colleagues point out that the possibility of being contacted was in the consent form:

    While you should not expect to receive any results from your participation in this research, if experts from the Biobank decide that research results from your sample are of high medical importance, we will attempt to contact you. In some situations, follow up testing might be needed in a certified clinical lab. You and your medical insurer may be responsible for the costs of these tests and any follow up care, including deductibles and co-payments.

    But some, like Ms. Konstadt, did not notice that clause when signing the form.

    Out of more than 36,000 participants, whose DNA its researchers analyzed, the Mass General Brigham Biobank found 425 with worrisome gene variants whose effects could be ameliorated by — depending on the genes — enhanced cancer surveillance or aggressive medical treatments to lower cholesterol levels, for example.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    How Much Coffee Is Too Much Coffee?

    September 26, 2023

    Depression risk spikes for those who eat these unhealthy foods, study finds: ‘Not a coincidence’

    September 26, 2023

    Dating After 60: A Lot of Roses, Some Thorns

    September 26, 2023

    Dengue fever: What you need to know about the mosquito-borne illness sweeping Jamaica

    September 25, 2023

    Bruce Willis’ FTD battle: Expert shares warning signs, what to know about the condition

    September 25, 2023

    Online Marijuana Shops Make It Easy for Minors to Buy, Study Finds

    September 25, 2023
    Trending

    8 people electrocuted as heavy rainfall and flooding sweep South African settlements

    September 27, 2023

    Trump, Weighing In on Auto Strike, Has a Mixed Legacy on Unions

    September 27, 2023

    UK regulators approve plans for vast new North Sea oilfield

    September 27, 2023

    YouTube prankster says he didn’t know he scared man who ended up allegedly shooting him

    September 27, 2023
    Latest News

    Bob Dylan Always Gives the Camera What It Wants

    March 10, 2023

    Is Tucker Carlson Too Hot for Twitter to Handle?

    May 10, 2023

    They Know Every Page of ‘The Book of Mormon’

    June 15, 2022

    Tiny Love Stories: ‘The Luxury of Her Attention’

    January 10, 2023

    Plot Twist: Your Big Secret Crush Is Also Your Housemate

    May 23, 2023

    California heat wave broken by storm as air quality degrades due to wildfires

    September 10, 2022

    Network Today is one of the biggest English news portal, we provide the latest news from all around the world.

    We're social. Connect with us:

    Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest YouTube
    Recent

    8 people electrocuted as heavy rainfall and flooding sweep South African settlements

    September 27, 2023

    Trump, Weighing In on Auto Strike, Has a Mixed Legacy on Unions

    September 27, 2023

    UK regulators approve plans for vast new North Sea oilfield

    September 27, 2023
    Featured

    Key Takeaways From Trump’s Tax Returns

    December 30, 2022

    In a California Town, Farmworkers Start From Scratch After Surprise Flood

    February 25, 2023

    4 dead in Chicago suburb after SUV hits freight train

    March 9, 2022
    Copyright ©️ All rights reserved | Network Today
    • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.