Network TodayNetwork Today
    What's Hot

    The Stars Are Shooting Again on the Tiber

    June 7, 2023

    Canadian wildfires pour smoke into US, heavy haze creates Martian-like scene in NYC

    June 7, 2023

    GOP Wisconsin bill requiring commission to disclose online who received parole to get final approval

    June 7, 2023
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms
    • Contact
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Wednesday, June 7
    Network TodayNetwork Today
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Energy
    • Technology
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Sports
    Network TodayNetwork Today
    Home » Alabama Redistricting Ruling Sparks Hopes for Democrats

    Alabama Redistricting Ruling Sparks Hopes for Democrats

    January 26, 20226 Mins Read News
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    After years of court decisions battering the Voting Rights Act, a ruling in an Alabama redistricting case is reasserting the power of the 56-year-old law — and giving Democrats and civil rights groups hope for beating back gerrymandered maps.

    The decision from three federal judges ordered state lawmakers to rework their newly drawn congressional maps. The Republican-led legislature violated the Voting Rights Act, the judges ruled, by failing to draw more than one congressional district where Black voters might elect a representative of their choice.

    Alabama’s Republican attorney general, Steve Marshall, quickly appealed the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit on Tuesday, and asked for a motion to stay the ruling.

    Still, the unanimous ruling — signed by two judges appointed by former President Donald J. Trump and one by former President Bill Clinton — was a sign that a key weapon against racial discrimination in redistricting could still be potent, even as other elements of the landmark Voting Rights Act have been hollowed out by Supreme Court decisions. The case hinged on Section 2 of the act, which bars racial discrimination in election procedures.

    A similar case already is pending in Texas, and the success of the challenge in Alabama could open the door to lawsuits in other states such as South Carolina, Louisiana or Georgia. It could also serve as a warning for states such as Florida that have yet to finish drawing their maps.

    “The Supreme Court has cut back on the tools that we in the voting rights community have to use to deal with misconduct by government authorities and bodies,” said Eric Holder, a former U.S. Attorney General who is now the chairman of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee. “Section 2 to now has remained pretty much intact.”

    The court’s ruling in Alabama — where the Black residents make up 27 percent of population yet Black voters are a majority in just one of seven House districts — comes amid a polarized redistricting cycle, in which both Republicans and Democrats have sought to entrench their political power through district lines for congressional and legislative maps. In much of the country, that has created districts that bisect neighborhoods or curl around counties to wring the best possible advantage.

    Civil rights leaders and some Democrats argue that process too often comes at the expense of growing minority communities. Black and Hispanic voters have a history of being “packed” into single congressional districts or divided across several so as to dilute their votes.

    In 2013, the Supreme Court dealt the Voting Rights Act a significant blow in Shelby v. Holder, hollowing out a core provision in Section 5. The “preclearance” provision required that states with a history of discrimination at the polls get approval from the Justice Department before making changes to voting procedures or redrawing maps. Last year, the court ruled that Section 2 would not protect against most new voting restrictions passed since the 2020 election.

    Mr. Marshall, the Alabama attorney general, argued the only way to create two majority-Black congressional districts is to make race the primary factor in map-drawing and called the court’s ruling “an unconstitutional application of the Voting Rights Act.”

    “The order will require race to be used at all times, in all places, and for all districts,” Mr. Marshall wrote in his appeal Tuesday. “Based on the political geography of Alabama and the broad dispersion of Black Alabamians, it is essentially impossible to draw a map like those presented by plaintiffs unless traditional districting principles give way to race.”

    The case is very likely to advance to the Supreme Court, where Justice Clarence Thomas has already indicated he does not believe that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act prevents racial gerrymandering, a question the court did not address when it struck down other elements of the law.

    The Alabama decision is the second this month in which a court has invalidated a Republican-drawn congressional map. The Ohio Supreme Court ruled state legislative and congressional maps drawn by Republicans violated a state constitutional prohibition on partisan gerrymandering. The North Carolina Supreme Court delayed the state’s primaries while a challenge to Republican-drawn maps there is heard.

    How U.S. Redistricting Works


    Card 1 of 8

    What is redistricting? It’s the redrawing of the boundaries of congressional and state legislative districts. It happens every 10 years, after the census, to reflect changes in population.

    How does it work? The census dictates how many seats in Congress each state will get. Mapmakers then work to ensure that a state’s districts all have roughly the same number of residents, to ensure equal representation in the House.

    Who draws the new maps? Each state has its own process. Eleven states leave the mapmaking to an outside panel. But most — 39 states — have state lawmakers draw the new maps for Congress.

    If state legislators can draw their own districts, won’t they be biased? Yes. Partisan mapmakers often move district lines — subtly or egregiously — to cluster voters in a way that advances a political goal. This is called gerrymandering.

    Is gerrymandering legal? Yes and no. In 2019, the Supreme Court ruled that the federal courts have no role to play in blocking partisan gerrymanders. However, the court left intact parts of the Voting Rights Act that prohibit racial or ethnic gerrymandering.

    Republicans argued the Alabama case, along with Democratic-led lawsuits challenging GOP-drawn maps in other states, are purely efforts to add Democratic seats to Congress and state legislatures.

    “This case is not about increasing minority representation, this case is about Democratic representation,” said Jason Torchinsky, the chief counsel for the National Republican Redistricting Trust. “It’s a cynical manipulation of the Voting Rights Act to get there.”

    In the sweeping, 225-page opinion, the three judges undercut Republican defenses of maps that have been used in litigation across the country.

    In some states where Republicans have controlled the levers of redistricting, including in North Carolina, Texas, Ohio and Alabama, legislators have stated that they did not consider any demographic data, including racial data, when drawing the maps. But the judges ignored claims that this “race blind” map drawing protects the process from claims of racial bias.

    “The reason why Section 2 is such a powerful statute is because the effects test doesn’t give two figs about what your intent is,” said Allison Riggs, the co-executive director of the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, a civil rights group.

    Redistricting lawyers said that view could reverberate in other cases, including in Texas.

    “Alabama, like Texas, tried to argue that it just didn’t look at race until after the map was fully drawn,” said Chad Dunn, a Democratic lawyer who specializes on redistricting and is involved in the Texas litigation. “That explanation is just not credible. The ostrich with its head in the sand defense in states that have an extensive history of Voting Rights Act violations is not going to work.”

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Canadian wildfires pour smoke into US, heavy haze creates Martian-like scene in NYC

    June 7, 2023

    Former Florida Deputy Goes on Trial for Not Confronting Parkland Gunman

    June 7, 2023

    UN judges declare 88-year-old Rwandan genocide suspect unfit to stand trial due to dementia

    June 7, 2023

    Sunak to Talk Tech With Biden, but the War in Ukraine Is Likely to Surface

    June 7, 2023

    Attorney for Minnesota man charged in stabbing death of teen girl wants his statements suppressed

    June 7, 2023

    Man Charged With Spraying Police With Insecticide on Jan. 6

    June 7, 2023
    Trending

    The Stars Are Shooting Again on the Tiber

    June 7, 2023

    Canadian wildfires pour smoke into US, heavy haze creates Martian-like scene in NYC

    June 7, 2023

    GOP Wisconsin bill requiring commission to disclose online who received parole to get final approval

    June 7, 2023

    Canadian refiner Irving Oil explores options including sale

    June 7, 2023
    Latest News

    How One President’s Day Became Presidents’ Day

    February 16, 2023

    UFO search: Retired Navy officer ‘not going to jail’ to report what he saw in Afghanistan

    May 6, 2023

    Pentagon Blocks Sharing Evidence of Possible Russian War Crimes With Hague Court

    March 8, 2023

    Melanoma can be prevented with regular skin checks and the ‘ABCDE’ rule: American Academy of Dermatology

    May 24, 2022

    China, Cambodia break ground on port, dismiss US concerns

    June 8, 2022

    Trial date set for Florida dentist accused of hiring hitmen to kill sister’s ex-husband

    December 16, 2022

    Network Today is one of the biggest English news portal, we provide the latest news from all around the world.

    We're social. Connect with us:

    Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest YouTube
    Recent

    The Stars Are Shooting Again on the Tiber

    June 7, 2023

    Canadian wildfires pour smoke into US, heavy haze creates Martian-like scene in NYC

    June 7, 2023

    GOP Wisconsin bill requiring commission to disclose online who received parole to get final approval

    June 7, 2023
    Featured

    L.Q. Jones, Who Played Heavies With a Light Touch, Dies at 94

    July 15, 2022

    GOP states side with parents in lawsuit against school that ‘shut parents out’ of kids’ gender transition

    March 28, 2023

    Person alleging Biden criminal bribery scheme is a ‘highly credible’ FBI source used since Obama admin: Source

    June 2, 2023
    Copyright ©️ All rights reserved | Network Today
    • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.