Network TodayNetwork Today
    What's Hot

    Georgia inmates enjoy steak dinner in jail cell, meal likely supplied by jail staffer

    March 31, 2023

    ‘Smoking Causes Coughing’ Review: A Superteam Saga With a Demented Twist

    March 31, 2023

    See How Baseball’s New Rules Changed the Game

    March 31, 2023
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms
    • Contact
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Friday, March 31
    Network TodayNetwork Today
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Energy
    • Technology
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Sports
    Network TodayNetwork Today
    Home » Cloud of Supreme Court Confirmation Bitterness Hangs Over Coming Fight

    Cloud of Supreme Court Confirmation Bitterness Hangs Over Coming Fight

    January 29, 20227 Mins Read Politics
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    WASHINGTON — It was a testament to the breakdown of the Senate’s judicial confirmation machinery that the first question posed by many this past week regarding an upcoming Supreme Court vacancy was whether Democrats could install a new justice entirely on their own.

    The answer is yes, if the party sticks together. And the prospect of President Biden’s eventual nominee receiving only Democratic votes is hardly far-fetched, given the bitter history of recent confirmation fights for the high court.

    Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the last member of the court confirmed by the Senate, did not receive a single Democratic vote. But Republicans held a 53-to-47 advantage and could afford to lose a colleague or two in ramming through her nomination just before the presidential election in 2020.

    With their bare-minimum 50-seat majority, Democrats will not have that luxury after Mr. Biden nominates the first Black woman for the court sometime in the next few weeks. Considering the toxic partisan atmosphere surrounding contemporary Supreme Court fights, it is conceivable she could make history not only because of her gender and race, but also as the first person elevated to the court by a tiebreaking vote of the vice president.

    It would be a far cry from the simple voice-vote approval of many of her predecessors as recently as the 1960s. Or the 98-to-0 confirmation of Justice Antonin Scalia, a leading judicial conservative, in 1986. Or even the 87-to-9 vote in 1994 for Justice Stephen G. Breyer, a member of the court’s liberal wing, who announced on Thursday that he would step down after nearly three decades.

    The decline in consensus Supreme Court confirmations has been precipitous, and the escalation of partisan warfare has been sharp.

    Deep bitterness lingers over the Democratic assault on Robert H. Bork in 1987; the routine deployment of filibusters against judicial nominees of both parties beginning during the administration of President George W. Bush; the Republican blockade of Judge Merrick B. Garland in 2016; the tumultuous confirmation of Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh in 2018; and the hardball Republican move to rush Justice Barrett onto the court two years later.

    With the Supreme Court deciding so many of the most polarizing issues of the day — including abortion rights and affirmative action — neither side is willing to cede much ground, and both display their battle scars.

    “It is a sad commentary on the nomination process that it has so disintegrated over the years,” said Senator Susan Collins of Maine, one of the handful of Republicans considered to be in play as potential backers of Mr. Biden’s pick. “If you look at the incredibly strong vote by which Stephen Breyer was confirmed, you just don’t see it nowadays.”

    Democrats would dearly like to avoid a skin-of-the-teeth party-line vote for whomever Mr. Biden puts forward. One of the first calls made by Senator Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois and the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, was to Ms. Collins, promising her whatever material and assistance he could provide to help her evaluate the forthcoming nominee.

    Democrats also hope the fact that Mr. Biden’s pick would replace a liberal justice and not tip the ideological balance of the firmly conservative court — and the fact that she will be an African American woman — will deter Republicans from a scorched-earth campaign when their odds of winning are low.

    But while Republicans are promising an open-minded review of the nominee, hard feelings over the earlier confirmation clashes, such as Justice Kavanaugh’s fight against sexual assault allegations, are never far from the surface.

    “Whoever the president nominates will be treated fairly and with the dignity and respect someone of his or her caliber deserves, something not afforded to Justice Kavanaugh and other Republican nominees of the past,” Senator John Cornyn of Texas, a senior Republican member of the Judiciary Committee, said in response to Justice Breyer’s retirement.

    Besides Ms. Collins, another Republican who will be the focus of Democratic attention is Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, a frequent supporter of judicial nominees of Democratic presidents and the only Republican to oppose Justice Kavanaugh.

    Ms. Murkowski is running for re-election this year under a new ranked-choice voting system back home. She is already opposed by a hard-right conservative vigorously backed by former President Donald J. Trump, who is furious at Ms. Murkowski for voting to convict him at his impeachment trial following the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. Siding with Mr. Biden’s choice for the court could help her attract the Democratic and independent voters she could need to prevail under the new election rules in her state.

    Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina and a former chairman of the Judiciary Committee, has also deferred to Democratic presidents in the past and voted for justices and lower-court judges they put forward.

    Last year, Mr. Graham, Ms. Collins and Ms. Murkowski were the only three Republicans to back Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, a front-runner to succeed Justice Breyer, for a seat on the influential U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

    Supporting someone for a circuit court seat is no guarantee of supporting that same person for the Supreme Court. However, backing someone for the high court after opposing that person for a lower court would be harder to reconcile, making it unlikely that any of the 44 Republicans who opposed Judge Jackson would reverse course and support her now. All were well aware at the time that she was a future high court prospect. Three Republicans were absent.

    Mr. Biden could also select Judge J. Michelle Childs of Federal District Court in South Carolina, who has been strongly endorsed by Representative James E. Clyburn, a powerful lawmaker from that state and the No. 3 House Democrat. If Judge Childs is the president’s pick, Mr. Graham and South Carolina’s other Republican senator, Tim Scott, could face pressure to back her.

    But home-state allegiance is no guarantee. Senator Michael Bennet, Democrat of Colorado, opposed the Supreme Court nomination of Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, a Colorado native, even though the senator introduced him at his confirmation hearing.

    Justice Gorsuch’s case is instructive. Though very conservative, he was the sort of highly experienced, pedigreed and qualified candidate a Republican president could have put forward in the past with the expectation that he would receive a strong show of support in the Senate despite ideological differences.

    But since Justice Gorsuch was filling the seat held open by the nearly yearlong blockade of Judge Garland and had been nominated by Mr. Trump, most Democrats balked. Just three voted for his confirmation. Only one, Senator Joe Manchin III of West Virginia, remains in the Senate; he was also the sole Democrat to vote for Justice Kavanaugh.

    Another potential nominee with a Senate voting history is Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright of Federal District Court in Minnesota, who was confirmed on a 58-to-36 vote in 2016. Thirteen Republicans voted for her, and five of them remain in the Senate today, including Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the minority leader. But a vote for a district court nominee does not equate to a vote to place a person on the highest court.

    Even before the nominee is known, it is clear the outcome in the Senate is most likely to be highly partisan, with the candidate receiving a few Republican votes at best — and perhaps none at all. For a country torn apart by partisanship and a court struggling with its image and credibility, that is far from an ideal outcome.

    “I really think it would be harmful to the country to have a repeat of what we saw with the last two nominees being so narrowly confirmed,” Ms. Collins said. “I just don’t think that is good for the country, nor the court.”

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Trump, Democrats immediately begin fundraising off indictment: ‘Our work isn’t over’

    March 31, 2023

    New Jersey passes campaign finance overhaul into law

    March 31, 2023

    New York lawmakers blame ‘big budget issues’ for likely failure to meet deadline

    March 31, 2023

    Trump indicted: NYPD orders all officers to report in uniform Friday ‘in preparation for anything”

    March 31, 2023

    Trump warns that he ‘cannot get a fair trial in New York’ after indictment on ‘disgraceful’ charges

    March 31, 2023

    White House mum on Trump indictment

    March 31, 2023
    Trending

    Georgia inmates enjoy steak dinner in jail cell, meal likely supplied by jail staffer

    March 31, 2023

    ‘Smoking Causes Coughing’ Review: A Superteam Saga With a Demented Twist

    March 31, 2023

    See How Baseball’s New Rules Changed the Game

    March 31, 2023

    Trump, Democrats immediately begin fundraising off indictment: ‘Our work isn’t over’

    March 31, 2023
    Latest News

    UK ministers tap Barclays to secure investment for new nuclear plant

    June 30, 2022

    Kyrie Irving Defends Antisemitic Documentary and Conspiracy Theory

    October 30, 2022

    ShutDownDC group plans ‘blockade’ at Supreme Court with ‘jail support’ on hand

    June 11, 2022

    Bernie Sanders flies first class to stump for fellow socialist candidate Summer Lee

    May 13, 2022

    CDC says respiratory viruses may continue to spread for weeks, ‘possibly even months’: report

    December 20, 2022

    UK man sentenced for murder after drunkenly telling police ‘what happened’

    March 17, 2023

    Network Today is one of the biggest English news portal, we provide the latest news from all around the world.

    We're social. Connect with us:

    Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest YouTube
    Recent

    Georgia inmates enjoy steak dinner in jail cell, meal likely supplied by jail staffer

    March 31, 2023

    ‘Smoking Causes Coughing’ Review: A Superteam Saga With a Demented Twist

    March 31, 2023

    See How Baseball’s New Rules Changed the Game

    March 31, 2023
    Featured

    Kennedy Center to Honor Gladys Knight, George Clooney, U2 and Others

    July 21, 2022

    FIFA and EA Sports End Two-Decade Video Game Partnership

    May 10, 2022

    Stephen Curry Is More Human, and Brilliant, Than Ever

    June 13, 2022
    Copyright ©️ All rights reserved | Network Today
    • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.