Spring is in the air, or hinting at it, anyway. But our cover model today is glad to be a little chilly after spending months in a Thai heat wave.

Michelle Monaghan, one of the stars of the new season of “The White Lotus,” joins me on Zoom looking like she walked straight out of the ’90s. Her structured leather jacket, complete with neck flap, is a thing of grunge-inspired beauty. “It’s a bit of a Cinderella moment,” she says. If Cinderella was a biker. Or Monaghan’s “White Lotus” co-star Parker Posey, a real-life ’90s indie queen. 

“She’s one of the most thoughtful, soulful women,” Monaghan raves of Posey. “She’s sage. She gives wise advice. She’s ethereal, but she’s grounded. I always call her a little bit of a witch, you know? I’d come over and knock on her door and she’d just have all of these kinds of lotions and potions. She’s like, ‘Come in here, try this, smell this.’ She was an incredible person to have on set, because she is so beloved by actors, and for the way that she takes up her space. It’s like an acting class, you know, the way that she improvs and she interacts with props. She’s just an amazing actress.”

The shout-out to Posey and other women in Monaghan’s life will be a recurring theme in our conversation. It’s a real sisterhood move, one that couldn’t be more at odds with her toxic female trio in “The White Lotus.”

Monaghan is part of the stellar ensemble cast in the hit HBO show’s third season, whose fifth episode just aired. “I’m as much a fan as anyone else,” she says, adding that she’s long been an admirer of creator Mike White’s spiritual insights.

“He’s a great observer of human behavior,” she reflects. “He sees everything and everyone. You know everything that he writes really comes from a place of authenticity.”

For devoted viewers, Monaghan teases a reveal that’s coming down the pike. “I think as we progress through the season, people are going to be shocked at how he wrote this a few years ago. Talk about being a seer! People are going to be like, ‘How did he know that?’”

She’s joining me from London, where she’s shooting the action-comedy “The Family Plan 2” with Mark Wahlberg, before heading home to LA to her family, husband Peter White, an Australian graphic artist, and their teen daughter and tween son. But today we’re here to talk about Thailand — specifically, the months she spent shooting this season of White’s famously vicious whodunit anthology, set mainly on the northeastern coast of the stunning island of Koh Samui.

There are, per the formula, several storylines revolving around various guests. Monaghan’s character, Jaclyn, is an actor who’s been famous for decades. “I thought, ‘Oh, gosh, that hits a little close to home,’” she says with a laugh. “And then I got access to all eight episodes, I binge-read them, and I thought, ‘Holy s – – t, he’s done it again!’”

Monaghan, 48, is an Iowa native who worked as a model while in college, then began to appear in films and TV in the early aughts, including the 2005 noir-comedy gem “Kiss Kiss Bang Bang.” She’s been Tom Cruise’s love interest in three “Mission: Impossible” movies. Between her pairings with Wahlberg in “The Family Plan” sequel and 2016’s “Patriots Day,” and her dynamo performance in 2007’s Ben Affleck-directed “Gone Baby Gone,” I tell her I’ve always thought of her as a Boston person. “I get that a lot!” she says. “And I don’t even think I had an accent in ‘Gone Baby Gone.’” I bet she would have crushed it, though.

In White’s show, Monaghan’s character is on vacation with two childhood friends (Carrie Coon and Leslie Bibb) who seem, at first glance, to adore one another — but that facade crumbles quickly. “It’s so cringey, it’s so relatable!” says Monaghan. “Of course this is heightened [in the show], but we can all recognize times in our lives where we have this kind of toxic positivity. They’re presenting kind of their best selves, and then, you know, inevitably, we start to see the cracks in their ‘perfect’ lives.” 

Monaghan’s storyline also ties into a cultural conversation about aging in Hollywood, a topic explored in recent movies such as “The Last Showgirl” and “The Substance.” Here, Monaghan’s friends snark about her when she’s out of the room, picking apart everything from her marriage to a younger man to whether (or how much) she’s had work done. But Jaclyn’s not the only one in this trio who comes in for scrutiny. Whenever one is out of the room, the other two go to town. “There’s this constant comparison that women oftentimes have with each other, and with themselves,” says Monaghan. “This was something that Mike’s witnessed a lot of in his life with friendships — the way that we endure those things and also perpetuate them.” 

Monaghan, who has maintained a meditation practice for the past several years, says she was taken with the show’s through line of spirituality, and loved the spiritual Thai locations they visited for the shoot. She points to a comment by her castmate, Natasha Rothwell (she plays Belinda, a character we first met in Season 1), about how all guests this season arrive with some sort of spiritual deficit. “You can see they’re all kind of struggling,” Monaghan says. 

The struggle was also intensely physical. “I mean, it just kept getting hotter and hotter. I think it wound up being the hottest summer on record. Even Thai folks were like, ‘This is too hot.’” 

But Monaghan says White still made the steamy set (most of the production was shot at the Four Seasons Koh Samui as well as three Anantara luxury resorts in the area) a playground for the actors. “He puts his magic wand on it. When you’ve got a bunch of people living together and, you know, interacting and befriending one another — it’s a special experience, for sure.”

White also arranged for a monk to give the hotel a traditional Thai Spirit House blessing. “The cast and the crew were all there,” Monaghan recalls. “That was really important to Mike, for us to take part in that. It was actually quite emotional. There was a lot of chanting. I won’t forget that day. It was really beautiful.”

As with previous seasons, the guests at the White Lotus are almost always wearing something beautiful and unforgettable. But when the cameras were off, Monaghan says, it was a different story. “You see the show and everyone’s dressed to the nines. In real life, we would be in T-shirts, greasy, hair tied back, sweating,” she says with a laugh. “By the time we got home, I think everybody wanted to burn their clothes!”

Our spring shoot with Monaghan took place in LA’s Silver Lake neighborhood, though not without a hitch: Our original location in Topanga Canyon was eerily derailed by a blaze, just a few months before January’s devastating countywide wildfires. Though Monaghan’s house was fortunately unaffected, she says, “everyone knows someone that lost [their houses]. We have multiple friends that have lost everything, and several more that have been displaced.”

When the shoot eventually happened, Monaghan donned a series of pieces from Gucci, Valentino and Giambattista Valli. Her favorite? An eye-catching, light-catching beaded gown from Oscar de la Renta. “That dress was so amazing,” she says. “It was incredible, all these tiny little crystals. Just beautiful. What a fun day playing dress-up!” 

 On the rare day she’s not jetting around for work, “I really love to bake,” she says. “I don’t even really have a sweet tooth, I just think there’s something meditative about the exactness of it. I’ll bake a bunch of banana or pumpkin bread and take it over to the neighbors.” 

This is a highly Iowa thing to do, I observe. “It totally is, oh my god!” she says.

She and her family go back to visit her parents in the Iowa countryside every summer, and she always looks forward to living it up Midwestern-style. This is a woman who knows country life: As a teenager, she won blue ribbons wrestling hogs at the county fair. Nowadays, she takes it a little easier. “Drinking beer outside, playing cornhole, lightning bugs, s’mores — that’s my jam, that’s my speed,” she says.

Last fall, she hit a meaningful family milestone. “I was teaching my daughter how to drive in the town I grew up in, which is, like, a town of seven people,” she says. “It’s very chill, there’s not even a stoplight. So that was a really cool, full circle moment. A realization of how far I’ve come, and all the wonderful things I have in my life.” 


Photographer: Sami Drasin; Editor: Serena French; Stylist: Ashley Pruitt; Hair: Bridget Brager at The Wall Group; Makeup: Kara Yoshimoto Bua at A-Frame Agency using Chanel Beauty; Manicure: Stephanie Stone at Forward Artists using Chanel; Photo Editor: Jessica Hober; Talent Booker: Patty Adams Martinez

Share.

Acclaimed cultural critics of our time – those whose goosebump-worthy words can both offer recommendations on, say, the best places to eat and change ways of thinking, offering a lens through which to understand art and politics ‒ are descending on Detroit’s Michigan Central next week.

The office of the Pulitzer Prizes will bring winners and finalists of perhaps the most coveted award in journalism to the city’s newly refurbished Michigan Central Station on March 26 for a panel discussion on cultural criticism. The event is part of the award organization’s Pulitzer on the Road series and will feature four experts in the field, including Free Press dining and restaurant critic Lyndsay C. Green.

Green was a 2023 Pulitzer finalist. The Free Press is a media sponsor of the event, which also is being put on by the Knight Foundation.

Works celebrated by the Pulitzer Prizes can, in a way, die after their win, said Marjorie Miller, administrator of the Pulitzer Prizes. Events like the one in Detroit are meant, in part, to give them new life.

It’s also a chance to share what it takes to create these works, Miller said. On the topic of cultural criticism, she expects panelists will delve into how opinion pieces differ from other journalistic works and said she hopes the writers will touch on how the genre has changed in recent years due to the prominence of social media.

“On social media, everybody’s a critic, right?” Miller said, adding there’s evidence people trust friends’ opinions more than professional ones.

“So I’m interested in hearing them talk about how they address that, how they try to counter. … Why should I read them instead of my brother-in-law? Or in addition to?”

There’s been a lot of talk about the “booming cultural work” in Detroit, Miller said. That and the presence of Green on the ground were draws for the program to make a stop.

Green will be joined by film critic Justin Chang of The New Yorker and film and popular culture critic Wesley Morris of The New York Times. The group will also be led by Jelani Cobb, a Pulitzer Prize Board member and dean of the Columbia Journalism School.

Chang won in 2024 for his criticism at the Los Angeles Times with pieces that explored both the idea of erasure raised around the blockbuster “Oppenheimer” and how he saw the representationally significant “Everything Everywhere All at Once” as still par for the Oscars’ course.  Morris won in both 2021 and 2012. Among his winning pieces on the intersection of race and culture in America was one that grippingly explored the most important filmmakers of the moment as Black people with camera phones. Cobb was recognized for his skillful commentary, particularly on race, during the first Trump administration.

Green got her nod “for rigorously reported coverage of restaurant openings and recommended dishes that also serve as an immersive cultural portrait of a vital American city,” according to her page on the official Pulitzer website.

More: My year in review as Free Press restaurant critic: Accidentally anonymous

More: ‘Detroit, we love you’: Eminem caps memorable night at Michigan Central Station

Green said it’s especially important in the predominantly Black city of Detroit that the entire panel is Pulitzer Prize-recognized journalists who are people of color.

The panel being all journalists of color wasn’t necessarily a conscious choice, but more of a happy outcome as they searched for great critics and board members to speak, by Miller’s description.

There’s an element of “I can do it, too” that is conveyed by the panel, said Green.

Once upon a time, criticism was a field without much diversity, said Nicole Avery Nichols, Detroit Free Press editor and vice president. It’s part of what has made Green’s award recognitions so meaningful.

“We’re standing on so many shoulders in that regard,” Avery Nichols said.

Criticism is also a shrinking field, she said. Yet the Free Press has been able to sustain.

It also has sustained its legacy as a Pulitzer-recognized newspaper and one that readers trust for entertainment and practical direction when it comes to restaurants, Avery Nichols said.

More: Free Press’ 10 Pulitzer Prizes span public service, reporting, photography and more

More: Detroit’s new restaurants lack diversity among patrons — and that’s a problem

She expressed particular excitement at the event being a chance to connect with readers. Green highlighted the chance to talk with other panelists about that important connection, too.

“In the same way that we’re bringing ourselves to the work (in criticism) … if we’re going to talk about culture, I don’t want to be talking to myself,” Green said. “I want to have that dialogue.”

Along those lines, some of the panelists will speak with Wayne State University and Henry Ford College students in journalism, media, film and writing programs earlier in the day, according to a news release.

And the Free Press is giving away tickets to subscribers for the main event. It kicks off at 6 p.m. at the former train station on the Michigan Central campus, specifically at the South Concourse at 2001 15th Street. The panel discussion will take place from 6 p.m. to 7:30 p.m., with a reception to follow.

The event is free but registration is required through the Michigan Central website. Event organizers already opened up more spots once after the initial registration roster filled up earlier this month.

The Free Press will be giving out 12 pairs of tickets from Wednesday until the eve of the event to subscribers who register through an online form.

At one point, cultural criticism may have been seen as lofty, high-brow and academic, but “it’s important for us to unpack where we are as a society, as communities, as culture” and recognize how arts, politics and more are impacting how we live, said Avery Nichols.

“On the lighter side, who doesn’t want to talk about books and film and performances and meals and sports and things like that,” she said.

This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Pulitzer Prize-recognized dining, film critics to talk shop in Detroit

Share.

Veteran Democratic strategist James Carville spoke candidly about his botched prediction that then-Vice President Kamala Harris would win the 2024 presidential election.

In the final weeks of the election cycle, Carville made the media rounds expressing confidence that Democrats would keep President Donald Trump out of the White House, even penning an op-ed in The New York Times titled “Three Reasons I’m Certain Kamala Harris Will Win.”

“The polls looked even, alright? I thought that Harris had more money. She also had more storefront locations, she had more doorknockers, definitely had better surrogates with two ex-presidents out there. Trump was going around with Scott Baio or something…. And I thought a combination of all of that would be worth a point and a half. It was not,” Carville told Fox News Digital in an interview. 

Coincidentally, Trump ended up winning the popular vote by a point and a half over Harris and ultimately won the presidency with 312 electoral votes. 

JAMES CARVILLE OFFERS LOVE ADVICE TO YOUNG PROGRESSIVES FOLLOWING ‘LOVE IS BLIND’ POLITICAL BLOW-UP

Veteran Democratic strategist James Carville reflected on his botched prediction that Vice President Kamala Harris would win the 2024 election in an interview with Fox News Digital. (Screenshot/HBO)

“You relearn the oldest lesson in politics. The greatest motivator of turnout, of voting, of persuasion is a reason. If you don’t have a reason, you can’t [win],” Carville said. “People had a reason to vote for Trump. The one reason that they were looking for, I should have taken this into more account, was people wanted some change.”

Carville recalled Harris’ now-infamous appearance on “The View” when she was asked what he called the “money question:” What would she have done differently from President Joe Biden? She responded, “There is not a thing that comes to mind.”

“She completely flubs it,” Carville said. “Well, 70% of people, we’ll have time to argue whether they were right or wrong, 70% of people want something different. Well, give it to them!… [Say] anything you want other than ‘I can’t think of anything.’ Worse answer ever given. Ever given.”

JAMES CARVILLE PREDICTS MORE DEMS WILL FOLLOW GAVIN NEWSOM IN SPEAKING OUT ON TRANS ATHLETES IN WOMEN’S SPORTS

Kamala Harris on The View

Carville declared Vice President Kamala Harris delivered the “worst answer ever given” when she said, “There is not a thing that comes to mind” about what she would change from the Biden presidency. (Screenshot/ABC News)

Since her defeat against Trump, Harris has already been generating buzz for a 2028 run as early polls show her dominating a field of potential Democratic rivals (though name recognition is likely a strong factor). Some have also floated her as a leading Democratic contender in California’s gubernatorial election in 2026 after its current governor, Gavin Newsom, leaves office. 

When asked whether Harris should either run for governor in 2026 or president again in 2028, Carville refrained from taking a strong position. 

“I don’t propose that somebody should or shouldn’t run for office,” Carville said. “If she runs for president again, she’s got to be a lot better candidate than she was in 2024. Maybe she is.”

JAMES CARVILLE SAYS DEMOCRATS BROKE HIS ‘FIRST COMMANDMENT OF POLITICS’ WITH ANTI-TRUMP ANTICS

The former Clinton operative remained convinced Harris would have been “a much better candidate” had Democrats held an open primary following Biden’s abrupt exit from the 2024 race, swiping those like CNN commentator Bakari Sellars for talking down such an idea, something Carville suggested was a regrettable decision by his party.

But when asked if it were up to him if he’d like to see Harris run again, he again didn’t take a firm stance. 

“Well, I mean, first of all, I think everybody should run,” Carville said. “I have a lot of friends. I would say you should run. You know, the more, the merrier, I think. And look, she’s a former vice president. She’s a former prosecutor in a big city, apparently very good at it. She’s a former state attorney general. So, you know, to the vice president’s impressive resume, I mean, who am I to say? But she certainly passes anything you say about who could run for president. She would have to think about it, but it would be very, very difficult for her to win the nomination, but it would be difficult for anybody else.”

VP Harris

Carville insisted former Vice President Kamala Harris would have been a “much better candidate” had Democrats held an open primary for her to compete in following President Biden’s exit from the race. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Carville admitted, “I was wrong,” in 2024 and his prediction was a “mistake,” stressing to Democrats that it’s okay to acknowledge when they are at fault.

“The public will never care if you’re wrong. When they’ll turn on you is when you’re boring or predictable. That’s what they don’t like,” Carville told Fox News Digital. “If you don’t say something in a colorful way that sticks with people, you know what you’re saying? It’s vapid stuff. And I think the public is just tired of talking points. They’re just worn out.”

Fox News’ Nikolas Lanum contributed to this report.

Share.
2025 © Network Today. All Rights Reserved.