Trump threatens to sue as BBC admits erroneous speech edit

By Paul Sandle, Sam Tabahriti and Jack Queen

LONDON/NEW YORK (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump has threatened legal action against the BBC for its editing of a speech he made in 2021 on the day his supporters overran the Capitol, which the ​British broadcaster admitted on Monday was an “error of judgment”.

The president’s lawyers said the BBC must retract its documentary by November 14 ‌or face a lawsuit for “no less” than $1 billion, according to a letter sent on Sunday.

The documentary on the BBC’s flagship Panorama programme spliced together two separate excerpts from one of ‌Trump’s speeches, creating the impression that he was inciting the January 6, 2021 riot, which the lawyers said was “false and defamatory”.

The revelation about the speech and wider criticism of BBC News has plunged the broadcaster into crisis, resulting in the resignation of its top two bosses, Director General Tim Davie and Chief Executive of News Deborah Turness, on Sunday.

Its chair Samir Shah on Monday apologised for the editing of the footage, but he rejected claims of systemic bias in the broadcaster’s news reporting.⁠ He said the BBC was considering how to respond ‌to the legal threat.

CRISIS SPARKED BY LEAKING OF MEMO BY STANDARDS ADVISER

The crisis was sparked by the leaking of an internal report that raised concerns about the BBC’s coverage, including the edit of the Trump speech in a programme broadcast shortly before the November ‍2024 U.S. presidential election.

Trump supporters overran the Capitol on that day, when Congress was due to certify Democrat Joe Biden’s win over Trump in the November 2020 election.

The editing was included in a dossier leaked to the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which also included criticism of the BBC’s coverage of the Israel-Gaza war and transgender issues.

Shah said the BBC accepted ​that the way the speech was edited gave the impression of a direct call for violence.

“The BBC would like to apologise for that error of judgement,”‌ he said in a letter to lawmakers.

The letter by Trump’s lawyers said the BBC violated Florida defamation law by deliberately omitting facts and deceptively juxtaposing them to create a false impression of what Trump said.

It is typically difficult for public figures like Trump to win defamation cases under U.S. law because they must prove defendants knew or should have known information was false but published it anyway.

Several U.S. media companies, including CBS and ABC News, have recently settled lawsuits filed by the U.S. president.

IMPARTIALITY IN BBC’S DNA

While Shah accepted criticism of the Trump edit, he hit back at suggestions the BBC had sought to bury any of ⁠the allegations around bias, or failed to tackle any problems. Asked if the charges ​of systemic bias were wrong, he said “yes”.

He said there were cases of individual errors ​and there were issues that pointed to underlying problems, but the notion of systemic or institutional bias did not hold true.

“I’ve worked in BBC News,” he told the BBC. “I know that BBC News’ DNA and culture is to be ‍impartial. It’s to provide the best ⁠news we can and the most trustworthy news.”

He told lawmakers that the BBC was committed to restoring public trust and ensuring its journalism meets the highest standards of fairness.

A spokesperson for British Prime Minister Keir Starmer denied the BBC was institutionally biased or corrupt, and said the government supported the corporation.

“⁠Clearly mistakes have been made in this case and the director general and Deborah Turness have taken responsibility for those mistakes,” the spokesperson said.

“What is important here is that the BBC maintains the ‌high standards for which it is rightfully recognised internationally, and that’s very much our focus.”

(Additional reporting by Andrew MacAskill and Elizabeth ‌Piper in London, Jack Queen in New YorkEditing by Paul Sandle and Frances Kerry)