Roughly a month before the 2024 election and over three and a half years after the January 6 coup, on Wednesday, US District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan ordered a brief written by Special Counsel John “Jack” Smith unsealed, providing the public new evidence in the government’s case against former President Donald J. Trump over his efforts to overthrow the 2020 presidential election.

Special counsel Jack Smith speaks to the media about an indictment of former President Donald Trump, Tuesday, Aug. 1, 2023, at an office of the Department of Justice in Washington. [AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite]

In connection with the failed coup, which culminated in the violent assault on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, Smith is attempting to prosecute Trump on charges of conspiracy to defraud the US, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction and attempted obstruction of an official proceeding and conspiracy against rights in relation to the state campaign to overturn the vote count. The “official proceeding” in question was the certification by Congress of Joe Biden’s victory over Trump in the Electoral College, by a margin of 306 to 232.

Smith’s latest brief is highly significant for several reasons. Not only does it include new information on the criminality of Trump and his allies, it underscores the utter failure of the Biden-Harris administration to defend democratic rights against the ongoing threat of the fascist movement led by Trump, which has full control over the Republican Party.

Seeking to preserve ruling class unity in order to carry out their shared agenda of global war abroad and suppressing the class struggle at home, in the wake of January 6, President Joe Biden and the Democratic Party sought to conceal the threat of fascist dictatorship, and artificially impose a “national unity.”

This is why Biden, and then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi repeatedly called for a “strong Republican Party” and why Smith was not appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election until November 18, 2022, over 22 months after the attack and after the Democrats lost control of the House of Representatives.

None of the information presented in Smith’s filing is “new” in the sense that it concerns events that happened recently; all of the crimes alleged by Smith occurred between 2020 and 2021.

There was no legitimate reason for the delay appointing Smith and there is no reason why Trump and his many Republican co-conspirators should not be behind bars. That they were not prosecuted, convicted and sentenced is entirely the fault of the Democratic Party.

Smith’s brief was made in light of the July 1 Supreme Court decision in Trump v. United States. In that decision, six fascistic, Republican-appointed judges ruled that presidents are immune from prosecution for most “official” conduct. The majority on the Supreme Court included three appointed by Trump himself, and two more, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, who played significant roles in the failed January 6 coup. They ruled that Trump’s official conduct that was immune from prosecution included all his contacts with the Department of Justice, which he was pressuring to “investigate” non-existent voter fraud and badger local election officials.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito (on right), Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife Virginia “Ginni” Thomas in the background at the Supreme Court in Washington, Monday, Dec. 18, 2023. [AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin]

In order to conform to the Court’s ruling, Smith filed a new sealed brief last week in which he sought to prove that Trump’s criminal conduct was private rather than official, and therefore not subject to immunity claims. Smith wrote, “the defendant must stand trial for his private crimes as would any other citizen.”

To determine whether an act was “official or unofficial,” Smith wrote, the Court should “determine whether the defendant was acting in his official capacity or instead ‘in his capacity as a candidate for re-election.’” If Trump,was acting ‘as office-seeker, not office-holder,’ no immunity attaches,” he wrote.

Laying forth the case against Trump, Smith bluntly declared:

When the defendant lost the 2020 presidential election, he resorted to crimes to try and stay in office. With private co-conspirators, the defendant launched a series of increasingly desperate plans to overturn the legitimate election results in seven states that he had lost—Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin (the “targeted states”).

Smith continued:

His efforts included lying to state officials in order to induce them to ignore true vote counts; manufacturing fraudulent electoral votes in the targeted states; attempting to enlist Vice President Michael R. Pence, in his role as President of the Senate, to obstruct Congress’s certification of the election by using the defendant’s fraudulent electoral votes; and when all else had failed, on January 6, 2021, directing an angry crowd of supporters to the United States Capitol to obstruct the congressional certification.

While the names in the filing are currently redacted, context clues indicate that Trump’s criminal co-conspirators include “private attorneys [Rudy Giuliani], [John Eastman], [Sidney Powell], and [Kenneth Chesebro] and [Steve Bannon]. The defendant also relied heavily on private agents, such as his campaign employees and volunteers, like Campaign Manager [Bill Stepien] Deputy Campaign Manager [Justin Clark] Senior Campaign Advisor [Jason Miller] and Campaign operative [Michael Roman].”

Share.
2024 © Network Today. All Rights Reserved.